Player: Okay, we know the cult got their unformatted ‘God Goo’ from some god that was killed. Can I make an arcana roll to figure out which one it might be?
Player: Wait, what?
Me: No, you can’t just roll, but you can research it. You can look through anything on the forgotten realms wiki or pretty much anything you find online. If you think you’ve got a guess, let me know. You can make a few rolls to get some clues…
We were at a key part of the narrative. The whole mystery was about to be unraveled and we were setting up for the end game arc. Some of my players knew Forgotten Realms mythology well, some didn’t. This wasn’t something I wanted to give them on a single roll that allows them to get some info and move on. I wanted it to be epic, to feel rewarded, to feel a bit of what their characters may be dealing with. While I was preparing the session and doing research, it struck me – I was running in a published setting, why couldn’t I have the players do the research just like I was? Why not move it to a meta place?
Finding The Answer
In my scenario, it actually worked out really well. The players made a few rolls to get some clues (the god was killed during the spell plague, some of the “God Goo” essence you managed to steal was demonically tainted, the consciousness of the god existed somewhere still – learned from a commune spell, the god was a god of magic) and then I let them loose. They all used their computers and the Forgotten Realms wiki. They asked if they could google search and I said yes if they could tell me an in-game equivalent. They came up with talking to a librarian at an arcane archive and off they went. About 20 minutes later they came up with 3 names. It was at this point I let them roll their arcana to determine the last correct answer, but I asked them what their guess was. They rolled to confirm and they were correct – they now knew the name of the god that was killed and whose essence was being used by the cult to try to build a brand new god.
All in all the process took about half an hour and provided some nice downtime between combats. I asked the players to short-form narrate what the searching was like (rewarding 1 inspiration per player if they could come up with a cool story) and they regaled me with details like piles of books falling on them, sneaking through back alleys to find the one arcane dealer who had the specific book they needed for the next part and a few montage scenes of falling asleep while pawing through books and having to put out candle fires on ancient tomes.
This method works well, but only when it works
This method was great to make the players feel a sense of accomplishment for finding the info. It was far better than the single roll and me narrating some info to them. There were a few necessary factors to make this work though.
- The Setting Info Is Out There
The setting I was using had a wealth of information available online. If the players were only relegated to books I had on my shelves, the process would probably have been boring and slightly annoying. There may be ways to adapt it – i.e. all the info you need is in these 10 pages and here are the 4 clues you’ll need – but the prevalence of information online and the ease of searching it was what made it doable. I would not do this for my own homebrewed world setting, partially because I don’t build details into the settings I make, just skeletons that the players flesh out through their actions, but also because homebrewed settings may or may not be as interesting to research into. They can sometimes be the GM’s version of a player going on endlessly about their cool character (He’s an outcast elf with two axes and a wolf companion!).
- The Players Were Into The Research
Â I wouldn’t use this approach for the players in the Storm King’s Thunder game I’m in. It isn’t the play style of the 2 Viking Barbarians, 1 Tiefling Pugilist, and 1 Bladesinger Wizard.ÂMy players were the right group that would enjoy the actual process of looking up and digging through the info. Two of the players knew enough information to be able to dig in, the others had enough interest in finding the information from the sources I pointed out. I’d been playing with these people for a while so I knew that their backgrounds and play styles would mesh well with this kind of approach. Part of what made me think of this was the prevalence of in-game research rolls being made. They were signaling that their path to finding out what was going on was by visiting in-game libraries or just knowing these things because their character paths were very knowledge heavy. I wouldn’t use this approach for the players in the Storm King’s Thunder game I’m in. It isn’t the play style of the 2 Viking Barbarians, 1 Tiefling Pugilist, and 1 Bladesinger Wizard.
- The Players Only Had To Narrow Into The Bullseye From The Center Ring
I was doing the research myself to make sure I had the names and dates right from the concept I had. I gave the players the site, the clues, and the relevant info all in the chat box. They knew what they were looking for and where to look. They didn’t have to try to find the grain of sand on the beach, just the seashell in the dirt. I knew what they would be finding since I gave them the source, I knew what clues to give them since it was all within a contained environment. The players weren’t going in without guidance. While their searching was within the lowest levels of what constitutes research, it was also only about 30 minutes of game time rather than 4 hours of homework. The activity was kept to a timeframe that was reasonable and didn’t fall too far outside of most people’s attention spans.
To Meta or Not To Meta
And that’s the question to ask yourself if pulling something like research into the meta – does this mesh with the flow of the current game or does it interrupt it and stop it.
You’ll have to judge for yourself and your game whether moving research into the real world would work well or not. For this game, it was wonderful and added a feeling of achievement. Oh, and if you’re wondering what the name of the Faerun pantheon god who was used to make the “God Goo”, well you’ve got all the clues they had and where they found the answer.
Very good. Great article
In my case, in an investigation into the Minas Tirith files, I used a goal, but more analog method. I put on background.
We played in our club. There is a room with multiple shelves with role and table games. That would be the broad archives of the city. With a multitude of scrolls and books on multiple things. Since the characters sought information on a particular topic, I told them that the medieval thematic games represented the volumes that could contain information regarding their investigation. Obviously not all. I also informed them that looking at the first bookshelf represented a week of work in the file. Looking at the second shelf represented a second week of study. And so progressively.
I told them that the tracks were in some yellow envelopes between the leaves of the books or between the pieces of the games, in such a way that they had to look for them inside them.
Immediately came the questions “Does this game almost medieval, but try something else, how we have considered it?” “As a volume that could be related to research, but not directly”
Of course, I introduced many clues. The more they plunged into the most concrete and extensive shelves. The players were distributed the material and began to look. In the middle of the shelves they stopped because they considered that they could already get an idea about what they were looking for, and even those shelves only found half of the tracks I put. It was fun and players had a sensation of personal triumph.