- Gnome Stew - https://gnomestew.com -

Why You Also Need To Be A Player

One thing I hear frequently from my fellow GM’s is that they are always a game master and never a player. Allow me to drag out my soapbox and say that if all you ever do is GM then you are doing yourself a large disservice. You are, in many ways, limiting your ability to grow as a GM. If you want to run the best games possible, sometimes you have to get out from behind the screen and pick up a character sheet.

GMing is not Playing

There is a school of thought that the GM is also a player, just with a special role. There are times when this is true, but in terms of the experience at the table, the GM does not have the same experience as the players. Because of this difference in experience, a GM who only GM’s is missing out. You are in essence, only getting half of the story. It is like a director who never watches movies. They understand how to construct a movie, but have never sat through a white-knuckle action sequence, or a gut-wrenching dramatic moment. How can you create a better car chase if you have never experienced watching The French Connection or Ronin?

The Player Perspective

When you are sitting on the other side of the GM screen, things are quite different. From my time as a player, here are a few observations of what the player perspective provides:

Improving your GMing as a Player

When you are a GM who is a player in a game, you have the opportunity to compare your experiences, taking what you know from being a GM and contrasting it to the experiences you are having playing the game.

We can learn from both playing under good GM’s and bad ones. Obviously we want to emulate and incorporate the things that good GM’s are doing, while learning what not to do from bad GM’s. As the player of the game you want to look at what the GM is doing and ask:

There are a great many things that can be learned while you are playing. I am going to focus on the good things you can learn, but you can learn an equal amount when these things are not done correctly. Here are just a few examples:

Presenting Scenes

Running Different Genres and Plots

Pacing

Information Dissemination

Downtime and Attention

Conclusion & Question

While being a player is not my favorite role in a role-playing game (I will always be a GM at heart), there is a lot to learn about GMing by sitting on the other side of the screen. By watching what your GM is doing, looking at what works and what does not, you can pick up valuable techniques to make your games better.

Do you play as well as GM? What percentage of the time do you play? What things have you learned by being a player? Do you enjoy GMing or playing more?

7 Comments (Open | Close)

7 Comments To "Why You Also Need To Be A Player"

#1 Comment By RonG On September 19, 2014 @ 5:05 am

While I really enjoy GMing, I also have fun when I get to just relax and be a player. I suspect I am not the only GM that has little choice in the matter though. It always seems harder to find a good GM than a good player.

I do take note of GM styles of others when I get a chance to be a player at Cons or the occasional table game at home. I also find the insights of other GMs on various websites and forums such as these to be a great help.

I think it might be even more beneficial if every player were to take a stab at GMing a few games, as all too often I don’t think the players realize the time and effort their GMs put in to the game for their enjoyment.

#2 Comment By Bisikoff On September 19, 2014 @ 5:08 am

You are out of your fracking mind, Phil.

As “the GM”, it’s not like I find my skills, my table-sense and active listening sharpened, and my GMing just better when I play in a session (especially right before my Con game(s).

cough

In all seriousness, I agree whole-heartedly and that’s as someone who likes to buy his own BS. My biggest challenge is that I just plain derive more enjoyment from GMing.

These days, with schedule – and really being “the GM” for so many groups (ad hoc and planned) – I mainly get my Player time in at Conventions or local store events. If I can get a game in before my event starts, I find I really get some real benefits.

I think the article nails a good number of them … for me, the biggest win is it makes me appreciate my Players and focus on empowering them and entertaining (and not in a “dance Screen Monkey, dance” sort of way … it reminds me to create a forum for the Players to enjoy playing in).

#3 Comment By froodbuffy On September 19, 2014 @ 7:26 am

I’m fortunate that I can be a player with two different GMs currently, and really fantastic ones at that. Playing in a game recharges my GM batteries. I can, as Phil pointed out, learn a great deal from those GMs (one is an awesome storyteller and the other excels at crunchy game mechanics and funny voices). Because I am a control-freak, I can’t help but notice how the other players interact or don’t interact, how the pacing effects the game, and which elements work to engage and progress.

At the same time, playing is just dang fun! There’s only so many games I can run (two at the moment) and being a player in 2, soon to be 3, others lets me really fill my game calendar. Avoiding spousal aggro for so much gaming is another problem altogether. 😀

#4 Comment By Blackjack On September 20, 2014 @ 3:57 pm

It’s tough to get time as a player in my broad social group because there’s a shortage of people willing to GM. Everyone wants to play but few are willing to invest the significantly greater amount of time to prepare adventures. As a result most groups are full, and good GMs have a waiting list of players who’ve already reserved a seat for whenever their next campaign starts.

#5 Comment By Scott Martin On September 23, 2014 @ 1:55 pm

I’ve been in that situation, but it’s been a while. Fortunately, almost every group has two or three GMs. Meeting people through public play and running short games (so short commitment for GMs) helped encourage new people to step up.

#6 Comment By Hedisus On October 5, 2014 @ 2:19 pm

I wish I lived where you game, as I have yet to find a group where I live that has more than one person who can, or even will, take over the role of GM. I haven’t been on the player side of the screen for at least two and a half years now despite my encouraging people to take up The Screen side of things.

#7 Comment By John Fredericks On September 21, 2014 @ 5:39 am

I learn a LOT sitting on the other side of the screen. One thing I notice is whether the NPC’s are entertaining or not. I a making a conscious effort to try to put more roleplaying encounters in my fantasy games, and playing helps me see how the game looks, well, when there isn’t enough.

But as Blackjack said, it is tough to find time. I’ve had more interest in folks joining my online game than I can handle. Not that I am great, but just that people want to play. It’s tough for me to try to commit to another night or two a week with family commitments.

One of my players wants to DM soon, so I may get a little break.