- Gnome Stew - https://gnomestew.com -

Making Connections


One of my players doodled this during the game. What better way to unwind after a bloody fight than a cooking competition?

I made a thing and want to share it with you, but let’s talk about character relationships first.

One of the things I love about RPGs are the small stories that pop up between characters amidst the larger story of a game. Back in the day, this type of thing often happened organically over the course of a campaign. Other than a few rare exceptions decided on during character creation (usually siblings or cousins), the characters brought to the table were strangers with one another and relationships formed as the game progressed. Of course, back then, I had far more free time and I was able to play the same game once or twice a week for months at a time. I certainly don’t have that luxury anymore and I imagine most of you are in the same boat.

Convention one-shots back then occasionally handled relationships in a different way. While many characters were just numbers on a piece of paper, some GMs would put some thought into who the characters were and how they related to one another. If done well, it could jump start the RP and get the players quickly invested in the game. You’d know that gal was your drinking buddy, while you were still mad at that guy for something that happened months ago.

I love this type of set up for a one-shot when it’s done well. Sometimes, the relationships for a given character can even transcend the rest of the character. A few years ago, I got to a Serenity game late and ended up with the only character left, an ex-farm boy, grease monkey that kept the ship flying. Not exactly my first choice, but beggars can’t be choosers. By pure happenstance, a friend was also playing that game and had picked up the charming con artist of the crew, a character my good ol’ boy considered to be his adopted little sister. When she ended up getting herself in trouble and went missing, it gave my character a whole new level of emotion to explore as we tracked her and the people threatening her down.

Many modern games have started recognizing that time is a precious commodity for most us and we don’t all have time to build up characters like we used to. To help facilitate games getting a running start, they’ve begun encouraging forming relationships at the start of a game through a variety of mechanical means. Dungeon World has its bonds, Monster of the Week has its history, Monsterhearts has its strings, Bubblegumshoe has relationships. Even D&D 5.0 has its background section and Fate has aspects. Perhaps not exactly the same thing, but it still jump-starts the roleplaying opportunities.

Recently, I ran a one-shot of Uncharted Worlds for my regular group. UW is one of the few PbtA games that doesn’t have a bonds or relationship section in character creation. There is a Cramped Quarters move involving relationships, but that is for use during the game and doesn’t help establish who these characters are to one another at the start. I decided we would still establish bonds between the characters even if it wasn’t part of the rules.

After the players created and introduced their characters, all members of an elite problem solving team in service to a powerful corporation, we went around the table and each player picked a connection to another player off a list I had created. Instantly, it set up some fun dynamics between the players.

They were having so much fun making connections, they added a couple more in:

These connections came into play almost instantly. Their mission was to rescue a kidnapped scientist who was close to a breakthrough on ship hull construction that would allow taking advantage of faster interstellar travel. She had been kidnapped by the Kyett, the adversaries from the last galactic war. They had her on a cargo carrier that was obviously more than it seemed. Peace with the Kyett was tentative at best, so the team was instructed that they must recover the scientist, but must also avoid causing a diplomatic incident.

When I started to name the scientist, Zolanda’s player asked, “Is the scientist Hina’s mom?”

Yes, yes it was.

Throughout the rest of the session, other connections continued to pop up. Xan and Troy bickered over Xan disabling the camera in his body armor so Troy couldn’t spy on him. Zolanda kept making Hina uncomfortable by mentioning her ‘friendship’ with her mother. Holgar and Hina ran into a guard patrol that let them discover that while on their bender, they’d apparently developed some hand signals that let them work in concert together. Neither remembered it, but both responded and took out the patrol. This earned a fist bump between them.

When we got to the finale, the dice were amazingly cooperative at making it tense and dramatic, but it was really the character connections that sold the scene. Upon finding her mother hooked up to a machine while an unknown alien experimented on her, Hina charged into the room using her Reckless move to attack. She failed spectacularly, allowing the alien to stab her in the gut and toss her across the room to bleed out.

This sent Dr. Hauss into a panic and forced him out of the safety of their shuttle to try and get to her in time to save her life. Again. Meanwhile, Holgar and Xan separately attacked the alien in response to Hina’s seemingly fatal wounds. They both had horrible rolls for their first moves, giving the big bad an upper hand. Both were hurting and starting to worry they might not be able to successfully complete the mission. Then, they looked at one another and recalled the battle that had nearly killed them both. Moving in concert, they combined their attacks to try and get the alien off balance. This time, the dice gave them spectacular rolls and they took the bad guy out. Dr. Hauss got to Hina in time to stop the bleeding and they were able to get her mom out of there, leaving the cargo carrier rigged to explode as it passed too close to an asteroid field.

Without establishing those relationships ahead of time, it wouldn’t have been nearly as engrossing or dramatic for the players. Sure, the game probably would have been fun enough without it and there are times where starting with a bunch of strangers is the way to go, but why not kick start your game with some established connections?

I’ve cleaned up the Connections sheet I created and linked it here for download. Feel free to take it for your own games. I’ve kept it as generic as possible, so it may need some tweaking to fit different genres. Here it is:


Have you done this type of relationship building in your own games? Did you get a chance to use this sheet? I’d love to hear stories of connections from your games!

6 Comments (Open | Close)

6 Comments To "Making Connections"

#1 Comment By Lee Hanna On May 12, 2017 @ 8:55 am

I did something similar for a batch of pre-gens in a convention game last year. I had a dozen pre-gens, so that players could have lots of choice. I made a grid of the PC’s names, and randomly rolled (d3 or d4? I don’t remember) how many connections they might have, rolled d12 to see which other PC, and then 2d10: the lower the worse connection, higher the better. I didn’t really note the type of connection off the top of my head.

Unfortunately, I don’t think a single one of my players even looked at the back of the sheets, where I’d put the connections and backgrounds. I certainly don’t recall anyone playing to those connections. The game does usually focus more on the gunfights than interactions.

I may consult your table if I get to revising the character sheets for this year. I have some ideas about re-typing the sheets.

#2 Comment By Angela Murray On May 12, 2017 @ 9:58 am

That’s a shame, but if they’re more into the gunfights, I can see that happening. I know I don’t enjoy Missions style games, where you bring your own PC to the game, but plenty of people love those.

I like your method for determining connections between the characters. That sounds like a fun excuse to roll dice and then try and figure out how to interpret them (especially the 2d10 part).

#3 Comment By Lee Hanna On May 12, 2017 @ 2:05 pm

Upon further review… seems it was actually 1d10.

I like being able to connect the dots, after using dice to generate the dots. That’s why I’m also a big fan of Traveller-style lifepaths– so much randomness, how can it be tied together?

We are also kicking off an LotFP/D&D Session Zero tomorrow, I will present this to the table for consideration.

#4 Comment By black campbell On May 12, 2017 @ 10:57 am

Over a fairly long piece of time, we had a stretch where there were regular players who were busy, or unfamiliar with systems we were trying out. They were always game (I know…), but they might not have a copy of the rules, or just wanted to jump in. As a result, I often got stuck as the GM crafting up their characters from either a thumbnail idea or whole cloth. I got very, uncannily, good at knowing what someone would want to play from just chatting with them over a few minutes. To get the characters to mesh quickly, I like to give them some form of connection, be it professional or personal. I also like to use character backgrounds to give me the story hooks needed to propel the campaign.

For one of our Space:1889 games, that had two players as twin brother and sister, aided by their faithful family butler. Ready to roll!

We had a Hollow Earth Expedition game that revolved around an unscrupulous archeologist, his NYC social gadfly buddy (the money man), a Shanghai gangster and one of his street urchin employees. This gave us two factions drawn together to find the McGuffin, and the young Chinese street kid wound up being the glue for the team.

The most tightly knit was our Battlestar Galactica campaign. It was also the easiest…why are you working together? You serve together. But there was the brothers-in-law pair of PCs, the chief of the boat who had served with the commander for a long time and got dragged from post-to-post with him. The commander was also married into a highly politically active family, which allowed us to explore the civilian side of the Colonies before the Fall, and then connect the surviving politicians to the same. (The players all had at least one military and one civilian character…)

The current D&D game was probably the most loose for the connections matrix. The idea formed quickly and players who were at a premium for the pulp and sci-fi games, seemed to come out of the woodwork when I mentioned D&D. Most didn’t have the books or the time to do a character creation sitting; they wanted to jump right in. The setting is late Roman Empire, as everything is falling apart, and the characters are on the frontier with Germania Magna. We started with a Roman legionnaire with a questionable background, a guy playing St. Augustine (before he was a saint), and then added a spoiled bard who has been exiled from Rome by his family, an anchorite monk who fights demons and is looking for the one that killed his mentor, and a dwarf from a local treaty-bound mountain hold. The first pair were traveling together in a caravan, then run into the last three — survivors of an attack on another caravan. The legionnaire’s connection to the new Emperor Gratian (whom he babysit while he was on campaign with his father) leads to their mission, while the dwarf’s local fame aids them in finding their way around, while the monk’s quest is one of the story hooks.

#5 Comment By Angela Robertson On May 12, 2017 @ 2:53 pm

I also love creating connections between players even if the system doesn’t have rules for it. A really useful product I use for this is called Backstory cards: [3]

#6 Comment By Angela Murray On May 12, 2017 @ 8:29 pm

Those are really cool. I love how they clarify what type of relationship they’d be creating as well.

#7 Pingback By Top (Around) 30 Articles, 2018 | Gnome Stew On April 4, 2018 @ 7:22 am

[…] Making Connections, by Angela Murray […]